Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10108/2024 Of Thomas George Muthoo...

Wp(C)/10108/2024 Of Thomas George Muthoot v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 14 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10108/2024 Of Thomas George Muthoot v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10108/2024 Of Thomas George Muthoot v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1945WP(C) NO. 10108 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: THOMAS GEORGE MUTHOOTAGED 60 YEARS S/O MATHEW M THOMAS, MUTHOOT TOWERS,M G ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682016BY ADVS.G.HARIKUMAR (GOPINATHAN NAIR)AKHIL SURESH RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- III POORNIMA, 28/243, NEAR MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN - 682036(APPEALS)- III POORNIMA, 28/243, NEAR MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN - 682036 2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P O, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695003 OTHER PRESENT: SUSIE B. VARGHESE-SR.SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON14.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T The issues raised in this writ petition are covered by the judgment delivered today by this Courtin W.P.(C)No.10359 of 2024. Therefore, the findings inthe directions contained therein will apply to this caseas well. Ext.P12 order is set aside. The petitioner ispermitted time till 26.03.2024 to produce thedocuments specified in Ext.P10 notice and any otherdocument that he wishes to reply upon before theAppellate Authority. The Appellate Authority shallthereafter decide the matter afresh, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- GOPINATH P., JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10108/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4Exhibit P5Exhibit P6 Exhibit P7 Exhibit P8Exhibit P9Exhibit P10Exhibit P11Exhibit P12 Exhibit P13 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORAY 2020-21 DATED 23.03.2022A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL TO THE 1STRESPONDENT DATED 22.04.2022 ALONG WITHSTAY PETITIONA TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP (C)NO.29060/2022 DATED 06.09.2022 OF THISHON'BLE COURTA TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED05.01.2023A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED27.01.2023 WITHOUT ANNEXURESA TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED06.02.2023 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED13.12.2022 ALONG WITH CASH FLOW STATEMENTA TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S 250 OF ITACT DATED 24.07.2023A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED05.09.2023A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED12.10.2023 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED17.10.202317.10.2023 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2023PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDERSECTION 250 OF THE INCOME TAX ACTA TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THEBANK STATEMENTS OF THE PETITIONER
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan