Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10270/2019 Of Avinissery Service C...

Wp(C)/10270/2019 Of Avinissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)

High Court 02 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10270/2019 Of Avinissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)
Date of order
02 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10270/2019 Of Avinissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI TUESDAY ,THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 10270 of 2019 PETITIONER: AVINISSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 400P.O.AVINISSERY-680313, OLLUR, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRANSRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1),AYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR- 680001.AYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR- 680001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),3RD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR- 680001. OTHER PRESENT: SC SRI. CHRISTO PHER ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Mr.M.Sasindran, the petitioner's counsel and Sri ChristopherAbraham, the learned Government Pleader. 2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondentto consider and dispose of Ext.P4(a) stay petition expeditiously. 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writpetition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider anddispose of Ext.P4(a) stay petition as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithin two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meantime the recovery proceedings pursuant to the ordersunder appeal before the second respondent are stayed. Sd/-JUDGE S.V.BHATTI css/ WPC No.10270 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OFCLASSIFICATION DATED 03.09.2016 ISSUED BYTHE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR.CLASSIFICATION DATED 03.09.2016 ISSUED BYTHE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR. EXHIBIT P4(a)A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DEMANDING THE PETITIONER TO PAY A SUM OF RS.81,20,796/-221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DEMANDING THE PETITIONER TO PAY A SUM OF RS.81,20,796/- EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2017 IN W.P(C) 38566 OF 2017.21.12.2017 IN W.P(C) 38566 OF 2017.EXHIBIT P7A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2018.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan