Wp(C)/10301/2020 Of Ranjit Ku.hazra v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/10301/2020 Of Ranjit Ku.hazra v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10301/2020 Of Ranjit Ku.hazra v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10301 of 2020
….
Ranjit Kumar Hazra
…. Petitioner Mr. J. M. Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- …. Opposite Parties
The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Odisha Region and others
Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
02.11.2021
Order No.
02.
1. Mr. Pattanaik, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appeal.
2. Without expressing any view on the contentions of the Petitioner, the Court disposes of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. If any appeal accompanied by an application for condonation of delay is filed by the Petitioner not later than 22[nd] November 2021, the explanation offered by the Petitioner for the delay in filing the appeal on account of the
S.K. Guin
pendency of the present petition, will be taken into account by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
4. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray )
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.