Wp(C)/10310/2024 Of Prava Ranjan Mishra v. The Central Processing Center, Income Tax Dept., Bengaluru
High Court
25 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/10310/2024 Of Prava Ranjan Mishra v. The Central Processing Center, Income Tax Dept., Bengaluru
Date of order
25 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10310/2024 Of Prava Ranjan Mishra v. The Central Processing Center, Income Tax Dept., Bengaluru, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 10310 of 2024
…..Vs. …..
Prava Ranjan Mishra
Petitioner
Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate
Opposite Parties
The Central Processing Centre, Income Tax Department, Bengaluru
Mr. S.C. Mohanty, Sr. Standing Counsel for I.T. Department
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER25.04.2024
Order No.
01.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Mohanty, learned Senior Standing Counsel for I.T. Department.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the notice dated 20.03.2015 vide Annexure-2 and refund of the amount of Rs.33,34,130/-. notice dated 20.03.2015 vide Annexure-2 and refund of the amount of Rs.33,34,130/-.
4. The claim for refund having been made in this writ petition, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRADesignation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal SecretaryReason: AuthenticationArun Location: High Court of Orissa, CuttackDate: 29-Apr-2024 17:16:30
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(G. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.