Wp(C)/10356/2024 Of Jayalekshmi Lathika Kumari v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
14 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10356/2024 Of Jayalekshmi Lathika Kumari v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10356/2024 Of Jayalekshmi Lathika Kumari v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, thiswrit petition will stand disposed of directing the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) (3[rd] respondent) before which Ext.P3 application for stay ispending, to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 within 3 months from thedate of receipt...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1945WP(C) NO. 10356 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
JAYALEKSHMI LATHIKA KUMARI,AGED 54 YEARS,W/O.S.N.ANILKUMAR, SREYAS , AYANIKKAD NAGAR, PALKULANGARH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 024.BY ADVS.DIVYA RAVINDRANLINCY GLANCY
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD -2(1), ROOM NO:A-104,1ST, AAYKAR BHAWAN, 1ST
FLOOR, KAWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN – 695 003.PIN – 695 003.
2THE ASSESSMENT UNIT,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, PIN – 110 001.NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, PIN – 110 001.
NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTER (NFAC), NEW DELHI,
PIN – 110 001.
SRI. P.R. AJITH KUMAR, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P1 order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appealbefore the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) along with Ext.P3application for stay. The only relief is sought for a direction to theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to consider and pass orders onExt.P3 and to stay any proceedings for recovery of any amountdetermined under Ext.P1 till such time as orders are passed on the stayapplication.
2.Heard the Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department
also.
3.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, thiswrit petition will stand disposed of directing the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) (3[rd] respondent) before which Ext.P3 application for stay ispending, to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 within 3 months from thedate of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till such time as ordersare passed on Ext.P3, any demand pursuant to Ext.P1 shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10356/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDERSECTION 147 R.W.S 144B OF THE ACT DATED29.2.2024 FOR AY 2019-20-20 ALONG WITHDEMAND NOTICE
Exhibit P2
TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEALDATED 12.03.2024 FILED AGAINST THE EXTP1 ORDER OF ASSESSMENT FOR AY 2019-20IN FORM 35 ALONG WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR AY2019-20 DATED 12.03.2024 FILED AGAINSTTHE DEMAND NOTICE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.