Wp(C)/10403/2019 Of Ckp Granites v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10403/2019 Of Ckp Granites v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10403/2019 Of Ckp Granites v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: After taking note of the tenor of the objections, to meetthe ends of justice this writ petition is disposed of by this order:-(a) the petitioner deposits 50% of the outstanding tax amount togetherwith interest on or before 10.05.2019 and the balance 50% of the taxtogether with interest on or before...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
WEDNESDAY,THE 03RD DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 10403 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
CKP GRANITES1/96, CHULLUTHARAYIL HOUSE, MAMALA POST, THIRUVANKULAM, ERNAKULAM - 682 305. REPRESENTED BY ITS' PARTNER MR. C.P. PRATHAPANBY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMARSHRI.ABRAHAM JOBSMTG.MINI(1748)SRI.AJAY V.ANANDSRI.P.J.ANILKUMARSRI.P.S.SREE PRASAD
RESPONDENT/S:
SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The prayer of petitioner is to accept the balance tax amount within
eight monthly installments. The prayer for granting installments is notopposed by the learned Standing Counsel. But the serious objectionraised is that eight monthly installments is completely unrealistic andthis Court may not exercise its discretion to encourage delayed paymentsby the assessee. After taking note of the tenor of the objections, to meetthe ends of justice this writ petition is disposed of by this order:-(a) the petitioner deposits 50% of the outstanding tax amount togetherwith interest on or before 10.05.2019 and the balance 50% of the taxtogether with interest on or before 14.06.2019. The default of any one ofthe installments the stay granted by this Court is vacated and it is for theAuthorities to recover the outstanding tax and interest in accordancewith law. In the interregnum subject to complying with installments nocoercive steps.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY// Sd/- PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.