Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/10410/2006 Of K.janakirama Reddy v...

Wp(C)/10410/2006 Of K.janakirama Reddy v. The Agrl.income Tax

High Court 15 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

15 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10410/2006 Of K.janakirama Reddy v. The Agrl.income Tax, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 24TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10410 of 2006(L) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.JANAKIRAMA REDDY, S/O.LATE PN KRISHNA SWAMY REDDIAR, CARDAMOM PLANTER, 162/1 LAKSHMINAGAYAGANPATTI, VIA THEVARAM, THENI DISTRICT, PIN-625 530. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.GEORGE SRI.JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE AGRL INCOMETAX & SALES TAX OFFICER, SANTHAMPARA AT ADIMALY. 2. THE APPELLATE ASST. COMMISSIONER, AGRL INCOMETAX & SALESTAX, VANDANMEDU, AT KOTTAYAM COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 10410 OF 2006 L -------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th September, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the WritPetition is not pressed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition isdismissed as not pressed. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy// PS to Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.