Wp(C)/10427/2007 Of M.p.santhi Varma Jain v. Agrl. Incometax Officer
High Court
26 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10427/2007 Of M.p.santhi Varma Jain v. Agrl. Incometax Officer
Date of order
26 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10427/2007 Of M.p.santhi Varma Jain v. Agrl. Incometax Officer, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/4TH ASWINA 1934
WP(C).No. 10427 of 2007 (N)
-----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
1. M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,
SANTHINATH ESTATE, KALPETTA NORTH, KALPETTA.
* LEGAL HEIRS IMPLEADED
2. P.PUSHPALATHA, W/O LATE.M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN,
KALYANAMANDIRAM ESTATE, KALPETTA.
3. SREEMANDARA VARMA JAIN,
S/O. LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN, DO-DO
4. SUSHENA DEVI, D/O. LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN, DO-DO
5. SIDDARTHA DEVI, D/O.LATE M.P.SANTHI VARMA JAIN, DO-DO
LEGAL HEIRS ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL.PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 AS PER ORDER DATED 26/09/2012 IN IA.1672/09 DATED 26/09/2012 IN IA.1672/09
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JYOTHI PRASAD
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & SALES TAX
OFFICER, VYTHIRI AT KALPETTA.
2. THE TAHSILDAR,
VYTHIRI.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, TRIVANDRUM.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.VIJULAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MJL
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
------------------------
W.P.(C)NO.10427 OF 2007
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 26[th] day of September, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that theassessment in respect of the agricultural income tax had been setaside by the appellate authority by way of Exhibits P18 and P19.In that view of the matter, the demand now raised has becomeinfructuous and therefore, no orders are required in the writpetition. Hence writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
MJL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.