Wp(C)/10513/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Apr 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/10513/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10513/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is accordingly rejected.” Considering the entire fact situation of the case and after going through the documents available on AD record, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
07. 03.04.2019Heard Mr. B. Panda, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner.
By way of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.08.2004 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhubaneswar rejecting the petition filed by the petitioner seeking waiver of interest for the Assessment Year 1995-96 and has prayed for issuance of a direction for waiver of interest levied U/s. 234-A of the I.T. Act for the said period.
The Chief Commissioner while considering the revision application filed by the petitioner, vide order dated 20.8.2004 under Annexure-2, has taken into consideration the same and in the last paragraph of its order observed as under:
“ In the backdrop of the above discussion, I am satisfied that the petition for waiver of interest charged U/s. 234A for A.Ys. 1989-90, 1994-95, 1995-96 & 1996-97 is not covered by the Board’s Notification in F.No. 400/234/95-ITB, Dtd. 23.5.1996. The petition is accordingly rejected.”
Considering the entire fact situation of the case and after going through the documents available on
AD
record, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. We do not see any cogent reason to interfere with the decision taken by the authority.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed being devoid of any merit.
.…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
…………………..……… (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.