Wp(C)/10514/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/10514/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10514/2004 Of Orissa State Ware v. A.c. Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed being devoid of any merit.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
09. 04.12.2019
SKJ
Heard Mr. B. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the opposite party-Income Tax Department.
2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.08.2004 (Annexure-2 series) passed by the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhubaneswar rejecting the petition filed by the petitioner seeking waiver of interest for the Assessment Year 1996-97 and has prayed for issuance of a direction for waiver of interest levied U/s. 234-A of the I.T. Act for the said period.
3. The Chief Commissioner while considering the revision application filed by the petitioner, vide order dated 20.08.2004 under Annexure-2 series, has taken into consideration the same and in the last paragraph of its order observed as under:
“ In the backdrop of the above discussion, I am satisfied that the petition for waiver of interest charged U/s. 234A for A.Ys. 1989-90, 1994- 95, 1995-96 & 1996-97 is not covered by the Board’s Notification in F.No. 400/234/95-ITB, Dtd. 23.5.1996. The petition is accordingly rejected.” satisfied that the petition for waiver of interest charged U/s. 234A for A.Ys. 1989-90, 1994- 95, 1995-96 & 1996-97 is not covered by the Board’s Notification in F.No. 400/234/95-ITB, Dtd. 23.5.1996. The petition is accordingly rejected.”
4. Considering the entire fact situation of the case and after going through the materials available on record, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. We do not see any cogent reason to interfere with the decision taken by the authority.
5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed being devoid of any merit. Connected I.A./Misc. Case, if any, also stands dismissed.
.…….......………………
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice Chief Justice
…………………..………
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.