Wp(C)/10530/2019 Of Ala Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
04 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10530/2019 Of Ala Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
04 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10530/2019 Of Ala Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case thewrit petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within two months from today.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 10530 of 2019
PETITIONER:
ALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.321SANTHIPURAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR-680 668 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RAJENDRAN P.R.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJSRI.S.VINODKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR,THRISSUR-680 001.
SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 10530 of 2019
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Arun Raj S., the learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel.
2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously.
3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case thewrit petition is disposed of directing the second respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously aspossible, preferably within two months from today.
In the meantime the recovery proceedings pursuant to theorders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed fortwo months from today.
Sd/-S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
JS
WP(C).No. 10530 of 2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED20.12.2018 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENTAND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEALFILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BYTHE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.