Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10592/2019 Of Aloor Service Co-Ope...

Wp(C)/10592/2019 Of Aloor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 04 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10592/2019 Of Aloor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
04 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10592/2019 Of Aloor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 10592 of 2019 PETITIONER: ALOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.693SAHAKARANA MANDIRAM MALA VIA, ALOOR, THRISSUR 680 683, REPRESENT BY ITS SECRETARY FILO T.J. BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJSRI.S.VINODKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2, (1) AAYAKR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAMNAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001. SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 10592 of 2019 JUDGMENT Heard Sri. Arun Raj S., the learned counsel for the petitionerand Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel. 2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petitionexpeditiously. 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writpetition is disposed of directing the second respondent to considerand dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from today. In the meantime the recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed fortwo months from today. JS Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGE WP(C).No. 10592 of 2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED23.12.2018 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTAND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2016-17 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEALFIELD BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITIONER FIELD BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan