Wp(C)/10638/2020 Of The Vellattanjur Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals
High Court
29 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10638/2020 Of The Vellattanjur Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals
Date of order
29 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10638/2020 Of The Vellattanjur Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2020 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.10638 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
THE VELLATTANJUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANKLTD. NO. 3906, VELLATTANJOOR P.O. THRISSUR 680 601, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALSAAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001.
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-2, GURUVAYOOR, CITY PLAZA, WEST NADA, GURUVAYUR
680 101.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29.05.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ
nak
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 14/11/2019 FOR THE YEAR 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 14/11/2019.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23/12/2019.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/01/2020.
EXHIBIT P4
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 21/01/2020.
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1/7/2019 INW.A. NO. 1536 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.