Wp(C)/10688/2010 Of Yucas Family Trust v. Agricultural Income Tax
High Court
29 Mar 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10688/2010 Of Yucas Family Trust v. Agricultural Income Tax
Date of order
29 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10688/2010 Of Yucas Family Trust v. Agricultural Income Tax, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932
WP(C).No. 10688 of 2010(I)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
YUCAS FAMILY TRUST, BARGIRI "C" ESTATE,
THOLPETTY, REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE S.V.IMBICHAMMED, BAITHUL MARIAM, 19/578, P.O. CHALAPPURAM, CALICUT.
BY ADVS. MR.P.RAGHUNATHAN,
MR.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. AGRL.INCOME TAX AND CT OFFICER,
VYTHIRI AT KALPETTA.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
KOZHIKODE.
3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER,
KALPETTA.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K.GOVINDAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W.P.(C).No. 10688 of 2010
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dated this the 29[th] day of March, 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J U D G M E N T
Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitionerhas preferred Ext.P2 appeal, along with Ext.P3 petition forstay.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2[nd]respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriateorders on Ext.P3, within one month from the date of receiptof a copy of this Judgment. Subject to this, all recoveryproceedings stated as being pursued against the petitionershall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENONJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.