Wp(C)/10701/2022 Of Jaidurga Construction v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
High Court
02 May 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/10701/2022 Of Jaidurga Construction v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
Date of order
02 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10701/2022 Of Jaidurga Construction v. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order No.
01.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 10701 of 2022
Jaidurga Construction …. Petitioner Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate
-versus- …. Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Opposite Parties Assessment Centre, Delhi and Others
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 02.05.2022
1. On being mentioned, the matter is taken up today.
2. It is seen that the impugned assessment order dated 31[st]March, 2022 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO), National Faceless Assessment Center, Delhi under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Section 144B thereof was preceded by a show cause notice (SCN) dated 29[th]March, 2022, i.e. two days earlier. The date of hearing was fixed to 30[th] March, 2022 which is just one day after the SCN.
3. It appears that there was no time for the Assessee to even properly respond to the SCN. On the ground that there was inadequate time for the Assessee to even prepare for the assessment hearing, the Court considers it appropriate to set aside
the impugned assessment order dated 31[st] March, 2022 (Annexure-10) and remand the matter to the AO for a fresh hearing for which purpose the matter will now be listed before the AO on 22[nd] June, 2022 on which date the Assessee shall remain present through his authorized representative. The Assessee will be permitted to file a written note of submissions including the grounds that have been urged in the present petition including those noted in this order. The AO, after hearing the Petitioner, will pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with law dealing with all the issues raised by the Petitioner in his written submissions. Needless to state that the Assessee will cooperate with the AO, so that he may pass a fresh assessment order as early as possible.
4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
5. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.