Wp(C)/10789/2011 Of V. Ajayakumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10789/2011 Of V. Ajayakumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10789/2011 Of V. Ajayakumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/18TH MAGHA 1934
WP(C).No. 10789 of 2011 (W)
---------------------------
PETITIONER :
---------------------
V.AJAYAKUMAR, VRA-A6,SREE AYSWARYA, ARIKKADAMUKKU, NEMOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.SRIKUMAR SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, DEVIKRIPA, PALLIKUKKU PETTAH, TRIVANDRUM-695 024. CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, DEVIKRIPA, PALLIKUKKU PETTAH, TRIVANDRUM-695 024.
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1),
TRIVANDRUM-695 024.
3. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3),
TRIVANDRUM-695 024.
4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRIVANDRUM-695024.
5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, TRIVANDRUM-695024.
6. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE, 5TH FLOOR, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-682 011. M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-682 011.
R1 TO R6 BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SR.COUNSEL, GOI (TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 10789 of 2011 (W)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1:COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT.27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2003-2004.2003-2004.
EXT.P1(A)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2004-2005.2004-2005.
EXT.P1(B)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2005-2006.2005-2006.
EXT.P1(C)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2006-2007.2006-2007.
EXT.P1(D)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2007-2008.2007-2008.
EXT.P1(E)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2008-2009.2008-2009.
EXT.P1(F)COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT. 27-12-2010 FOR THE YEAR2009-2010.2009-2010.
EXT.P2COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19-11-2008.
EXT.P2(a)COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6-3-2011.
EXT.P3COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3-11-2010.
EXT.P3(A)COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3-11-2010.
EXT.P3(B)COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3-11-2010.
EXT.P3(C)COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3-11-2010.
(Contd...)
WP(C).No. 10789 of 2011 (W)
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
--------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.10789 of 2011
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 7[th] day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
The writ petition was filed seeking the orders oflifting the attachment ordered as per Ext.P6. It is nowconfirmed by the respondents also that following theorders passed by the appellate authority, the attachmenthas been lifted. Therefore, the prayer sought in the writpetition has now become infructuous.
The writ petition is closed.
ln
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.