Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10792/2020 Of The Vilvattom Servic...

Wp(C)/10792/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals

High Court 02 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10792/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals
Date of order
02 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10792/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeals, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1942 WP(C).No.10792 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: THE VILVATTOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.337P.O KURICHIKKARA, THRISSUR 680 028 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALSAAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ,WARD 2(3), THRISSUR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMOURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR 680 001 OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 2[nd] day of June 2020 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) againstthe assessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. sab Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 08/12/2017 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 8/12/2017 EXHIBIT P3EXHIBIT P4EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 19/1/2018TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10/3/2020 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 13/3/2020 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1/7/2019 IN W.A NO. 1536 OF 2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan