Wp(C)/10793/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
02 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10793/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
02 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10793/2020 Of The Vilvattom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.10793 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
THE VILVATTOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.337, P. O. KURICHIKKARA, THRISSUR - 680 028, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
SRI.K.S.ANIL
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S. T. NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001.
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD - 2(3), THRISSUR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTHANTHAMPOURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 2nd day of June 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction
to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.11.2017.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 27.11.2017.
EXHIBIT P3EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 3.1.2018.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.3.2020.TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 13.3.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.2019
IN W.A.NO.1536 OF 2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.