Wp(C)/10814/2024 Of Yogakshema Trust v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10814/2024 Of Yogakshema Trust v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10814/2024 Of Yogakshema Trust v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945WP(C) NO. 10814 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
YOGAKSHEMA TRUST
REPRESENTED BY, ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE KESHAVA SMRITHI CHITHRA LANE, ALUVA, KERALA, PIN - 683101BY ADV SUVIN.R.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX /INCOME TAX OFFICER,INCOME TAX /INCOME TAX OFFICER,
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE
NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)/ THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE ROOM NO 245 A NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 10814 OF 2024 2
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2018-19 under the Income Tax Act, 1961, thepetitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2[nd] respondent,a copy of which is produced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay ofproceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also beenfiled as Ext.P4. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedingseven before the petition for stay is considered. Hence, thiswrit petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for
the petitioner as well as the respondent-Department, I am ofthe opinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed with adirection.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 appeal,within a period of three months from the date of receipt of acertified copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken,all coercive proceedings against the petitioner in respect ofExts. P1 and P2 shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P., JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10814/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
Exhibit P2
Exhibit P3
Exhibit P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED06/04/2021 UNDER SECTION 143(3) READ WITHSECTIONS 143(3A) & 143(3B) OF THE INCOME-TAXACT FOR THE AY 2018-19 ISSUED BY THE FIRSTRESPONDENT
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED06/04/2021 UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961
A TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL E-FILED ON13/08/2021 FOR THE AY 2018-19
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION, SEND BYPOST TO THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY THROUGH POST,FOR THE AY 2018-19
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.