Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10887/2015 Of M/S. Mithra Agricula...

Wp(C)/10887/2015 Of M/S. Mithra Agriculaturalproducts Co.ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 07 Apr 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10887/2015 Of M/S. Mithra Agriculaturalproducts Co.ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10887/2015 Of M/S. Mithra Agriculaturalproducts Co.ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/17TH CHAITHRA, 1937 PETITIONER: ------------------- WP(C).No. 10887 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- M/S. MITHRA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE COMPANY LTD., 40/1550, DERG, AKSHARA MANDIRAM, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI - 682 011, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI.ANSON K.MALIAKKAL. BY SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-III, 6TH FLOOR, KERABHAVAN, SRVHS ROAD, COCHIN - 682 016. 6TH FLOOR, KERABHAVAN, SRVHS ROAD, COCHIN - 682 016. *ADDL.R5 IMPLEADED 5. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, 1ST FLOOR,(BLOCK C-I & C-II), KENDRIYA BHAVAN, OPP.CSEZ, KAKKANAD, COCHIN - 682 037, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. 1ST FLOOR,(BLOCK C-I & C-II), KENDRIYA BHAVAN, OPP.CSEZ, KAKKANAD, COCHIN - 682 037, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 7.4.2015 IN IA.5312/2015. BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ----------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 :TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE F.NO.65/JCIT/(TDS)/KOCHI/271C/2011-12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2009-10 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2009-10 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT P(A) :TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE F.NO.65/JCIT/(TDS)/KOCHI/271C/2011-12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2010-11 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2010-11 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT. P1(B) :TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE F.NO.65/JCIT/(TDS)/KOCHI/271C/2011-12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2011-12 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.12/34 DATED 6.2.2012 FOR A.Y.2011-12 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 :TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 29.2.2012 GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE FY.2009-10.2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE FY.2009-10. EXHIBIT P3 :TRUE COPY OF THE TABULATION STATEMENT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF TDS AMOUNT FOR F.Y 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12.REMITTANCE OF TDS AMOUNT FOR F.Y 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12. EXHIBIT P4 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.8.2012 ISSUED U/S 271C FOR AY-2009-10 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.AY-2009-10 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE. EXT. P4(A) :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.8.2012 ISSUED U/S 271C FOR AY-2010-11 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.AY-2010-11 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE. EXT. P4(B) :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.8.2012 ISSUED U/S 271C FOR AY-2011-12 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.AY-2011-12 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE. EXHIBIT P5 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.27/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2009-10.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2009-10. EXHIBIT P6 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.28/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2010-11.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2010-11. EXHIBIT P7 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.29/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2011-12.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2011-12. EXHIBIT P8 :TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.CIT(TDS)/KOCHI/PROSECUTION-25/2012-13 DATED 7.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.25/2012-13 DATED 7.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT. P4(B) :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.8.2012 ISSUED U/S 271C FOR AY-2011-12 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.AY-2011-12 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE. EXHIBIT P5 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.27/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2009-10.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2009-10. EXHIBIT P6 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.28/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2010-11.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2010-11. EXHIBIT P7 :TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.29/TDS/EKM/CIT(A)-111/12-13DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2011-12.DATED 21.1.2015 FOR AY-2011-12. EXHIBIT P8 :TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.CIT(TDS)/KOCHI/PROSECUTION-25/2012-13 DATED 7.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.25/2012-13 DATED 7.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P9 :TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 31.3.2014 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P10 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ACIT(TDS)/KOCHI/PROSECUTION/2014-15/9 DATED 15.12.2014.KOCHI/PROSECUTION/2014-15/9 DATED 15.12.2014. EXHIBIT P11 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 5.2.2015 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P12 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30.3.2015 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. --2-- WP(C).No. 10887 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P13 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-10.5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-10. EXT. P13(A) :TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-10.BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2009-10. EXHIBIT P14 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11.5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11. EXT. P14(A) :TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11.BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11. EXHIBIT P15 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2011-12.5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2011-12. EXT. P15(A) :TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2011-12.BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2011-12. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: --------------------------------------- - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ................................................. W.P.(C) No.10887 of 2015 (I) ............................................... Dated this the 7[th] day of April, 2015 JUDGMENT Challenging Exts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) assessment orders underthe Income Tax Act, 1961, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P13,P14 and P15 appeals along with Exts.P13(a), P14(a) and P15(a)stay petitions before the 5[th] respondent. It is the case of thepetitioner that even prior to considering the stay petitions,recovery steps have been initiated against him through Exts.P8and P10 notices, for recovery of the amounts confirmed inExts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) assessment orders. 2. I have heard Sri.T.M.Sreedharan, learned senior counselappearing for petitioner and Sri.K.M.V.Pandalai, learnedstanding counsel for the respondents. appearing for petitioner and Sri.K.M.V.Pandalai, learnedstanding counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Challenging Exts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) assessment orders underthe Income Tax Act, 1961, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P13,P14 and P15 appeals along with Exts.P13(a), P14(a) and P15(a)stay petitions before the 5[th] respondent. It is the case of thepetitioner that even prior to considering the stay petitions,recovery steps have been initiated against him through Exts.P8and P10 notices, for recovery of the amounts confirmed inExts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) assessment orders. 2. I have heard Sri.T.M.Sreedharan, learned senior counselappearing for petitioner and Sri.K.M.V.Pandalai, learnedstanding counsel for the respondents. appearing for petitioner and Sri.K.M.V.Pandalai, learnedstanding counsel for the respondents. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case andthe submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petitionwith a direction to the 5[th] respondent to pass orders on Exts.P13(a), P14(a) and P15(a) stay petitions preferred by the petitionerbefore him, within a period of two months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.The order to be passed by the 5[th] respondent shall containreasons for the decision arrived at by him.the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petitionwith a direction to the 5[th] respondent to pass orders on Exts.P13(a), P14(a) and P15(a) stay petitions preferred by the petitionerbefore him, within a period of two months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.The order to be passed by the 5[th] respondent shall containreasons for the decision arrived at by him. Recovery steps, for recovery of the amounts confirmed againstthe petitioner by Exts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) assessment orders, asalso all further steps pursuant to Exts.P8 and P10 notices, shallbe kept in abeyance till such time as the 5[th] respondent passesorders, as directed above, and communicates the same to thepetitioner. AMV/07/04/ Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan