Wp(C)/10962/2019 Of The Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
08 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10962/2019 Of The Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/10962/2019 Of The Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 10962 of 2019
PETITIONER:
THE CHOVVA CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTDCHOVVA P.O, KANNUR-670 006, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AJAYAKUMAR C.V.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJ SMT.C.T.SUJA
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1, KANNUR RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-670 006
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-:2:-
J U D G M E N T
Heard Sri. S. Arun Raj, the petitioner's counsel and Sri. ChristopherAbraham, the learned Standing Counsel.
2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondentto consider and dispose of Exts.P7 to P9 stay petitions expeditiously.
3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writpetition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider anddispose of Exts.P7 to P9 stay petitions as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.
Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal beforethe second respondent are stayed for two months from today.
DST
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.03.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2013-14.29.03.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2013-14.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.12.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY-2014-15.19.12.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY-2014-15.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2016-17.18.12.2018 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14
EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2016-17
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
//True copy//
P.A.To Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.