Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/10986/2019 Of The Kararinakam Serv...

Wp(C)/10986/2019 Of The Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 08 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/10986/2019 Of The Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/10986/2019 Of The Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 10986 of 2019 PETITIONER: THE KARARINAKAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.KADALAYI P.O., KANNUR- 670007, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.P.SUNANDA KUMARI. BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJ SMT.C.T.SUJA RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1 AND TPS, KANNUR RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-670006. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001. OTHER PRESENT: SC SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Heard Sri. S. Arun Raj, the petitioner's counsel and Sri. Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel. 2.The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondentto consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition expeditiously. 3.Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writpetition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider anddispose of Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithin two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal beforethe second respondent are stayed for two months from today. DST Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE -:3:- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.12.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2014-15.EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15.EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2014-15. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL //True copy// P.A.To Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan