Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/11012/2011 Of U.v.noushad v. Agric...

Wp(C)/11012/2011 Of U.v.noushad v. Agriculture Income Tax & Commercial

High Court 20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

20 Jul 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/11012/2011 Of U.v.noushad v. Agriculture Income Tax & Commercial, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 11012 of 2011(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- U.V.NOUSHAD, SON AND LEGAL HEIR OF LATE P.MOIDEEN, PROPRIETOR OF AL-AMEEN WOOD INDUSTRIES, KANHANGAD, RESIDING AT U.V.HOUSE, AJANUR, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, SMT.K.HYMAVATHY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, HOSDURG, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 121. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM-691 021. 3. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, HOSDURG, PIN-671 121. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.11012/2011-B: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER PASSED BY R.1. DTD. 13/12/2006.EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER PASSED BY R.1. DTD. 11/01/2011.EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REVISIONAL ORDER PASSED BY R.2. DTD. 17/03/2008.EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S BROTHERMR. U.V. SHAHID. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 11012 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that sincethe petitioner has already approached the revisional authorityfor restoration of the revision petition, which was dismissed fordefault, this writ petition may be closed without prejudice to theright of the petitioner to prosecute the application for restorationof the revision petition. Permission is granted and the writpetition is closed with the above liberty. Tds/ Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.