Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/11041/2020 Of Thrickodithanam Serv...

Wp(C)/11041/2020 Of Thrickodithanam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 05 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11041/2020 Of Thrickodithanam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
05 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/11041/2020 Of Thrickodithanam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1942 WP(C).No.11041 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: THRICKODITHANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.178THRICKODITHANAM P.O., CHENGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT/S: OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON05.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23/12/2019 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT FORTHE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 03/02/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 03/02/2020 OR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR STAYING ORDERFOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.03/02/2020 OR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR STAYING ORDERFOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 28/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.28/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION DATED 28/02/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.28/02/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 16/03/2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.16/03/2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan