Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/11152/2020 Of Kottekkad People Wel...

Wp(C)/11152/2020 Of Kottekkad People Welfare Sahakarana Sangam Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 08 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11152/2020 Of Kottekkad People Welfare Sahakarana Sangam Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/11152/2020 Of Kottekkad People Welfare Sahakarana Sangam Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 18TH JYAISHTA, 1942 WP(C).No.11152 OF 2020(T) PETITIONER/S: KOTTEKKAD PEOPLE WELFARE SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD.NO.1420,KUTTUR P.O., THRISSUR-680013, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MARY LEENA. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.JOJO RESPONDENT/S: 1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD -2(2), THRISSUR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NEAR SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER, THRISSUR-680001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todisposeof Ext.P3appealpreferredbeforethe2[nd]respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to take adecision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. nak Sd/- AMIT RAWALJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AY 2017-18 DATED 30/12/2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 156 DATED 30/12/2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13/01/2020. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 25/02/2020 FOR 20% OF TAX. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DEMANDING THE ENTIRE TAX DATED 12/03/2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan