Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/11266/2009 Of The Kurumathur Servi...

Wp(C)/11266/2009 Of The Kurumathur Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Cib)

High Court 06 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11266/2009 Of The Kurumathur Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Cib)
Date of order
06 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/11266/2009 Of The Kurumathur Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer (Cib), the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2009 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11266 of 2009(C) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- THE KURUMATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT.K.K.SANTHA, W/O.RAJAN, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOLLIAM VALAPPIL HOUSE, P.O.PANNIYOOR, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (CIB), OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,(INV), KOZHIKODE. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, (INV), KOZHIKODE. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CIB), COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 4. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI. R1 TO R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.JOSE JOSEPH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2009, ALONG WITH W.P.(C) NO.11294/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.11266 of 2009-C &W.P.(C) No.11294 of 2009-F ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 6[th] day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T I heard learned counsel for the petitioner andlearned standing counsel for the Income Tax Department. 2. The issue raised in these cases is covered bymy judgment in W.P.(C) No.9926/2009 and connected cases.Following the same, these writ petitions fail and they aredismissed. However, I feel that petitioner can be granted sixweeks' time from today to comply with the directions in thenotice. It is so ordered. MS (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan