Wp(C)/11285/2019 Of Ambalapad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (1)
High Court
09 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11285/2019 Of Ambalapad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (1)
Date of order
09 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-2017
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/11285/2019 Of Ambalapad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (1), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4(a) stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1941WP(C).No. 11285 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
AMBALAPAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.759XI/57, P.O.KUNDUKAD-680028, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRANSRI.V.VENUGOPAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 (1)AYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001AYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.M.Sasindran, the learned counsel for the petitioner
and Sri.Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counselappearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner prays for a direction to the 2[nd] respondent toconsider and dispose of Ext.P4(a) stay petition expeditiously.
3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ
petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and
dispose of Ext.P4(a) stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
In the meantime the recovery proceedings are stayed for twomonths from today.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
Ac
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION DATED 3.10.2016 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR(GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR.CLASSIFICATION DATED 3.10.2016 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR(GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR.
EXHIBIT P1 AA TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(GENERAL) THALAPPILLY DATED 21/01/2019THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(GENERAL) THALAPPILLY DATED 21/01/2019
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.12.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-201721.12.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-2017
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 30.10.201830.10.2018
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4 AA TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT
EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2017 IN WP(C)NO.38566/201721.12.2017 IN WP(C)NO.38566/2017
RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS: NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.