Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/11358/2021 Of Bank Of Baroda v. In...

Wp(C)/11358/2021 Of Bank Of Baroda v. Income Tax Office

High Court 09 Oct 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11358/2021 Of Bank Of Baroda v. Income Tax Office
Date of order
09 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/11358/2021 Of Bank Of Baroda v. Income Tax Office, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 9 DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 17TH ASWINA, 1945WP(C) NO. 11358 OF 2021 PETITIONER: BANK OF BARODA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, JOSE ANNEX, JOSE JUNCTION, MG ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 016. BY ADVS.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN (N-125)-18565SAIJO HASSANBENOJ C AUGUSTINRAFEEK. V.K.P.PARVATHYMANAS P HAMEED RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, MUMBAI REGION, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI – 400020.REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, MUMBAI REGION, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI – 400020. 2INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001. 3KUNHIRAMAN P.K, S/O. LATE T.K.R.K. NAIR, ‘REMYA’, CIVIL LINES ROAD, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR 680 003.‘REMYA’, CIVIL LINES ROAD, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR 680 003. 4THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001. 5THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS),CIRCLE 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001.CIRCLE 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001. BY ADVS.PHILIP T.VARGHESEV.T.LITHASHRUTHI SARA JACOBAMRUTHA RAMESHK.R.MONISHANITYA R.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2- JUDGMENT Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan – learned counsel forthe petitioner, submitted that, in view of thedirections issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.18130/2020, this writ petition is not beingpressed; and further that the applicationsbefore the Income Tax Department, filed by hisclient, will also not be pursued. Recording the afore submissions, this writpetition is dismissed as not pressed. akv Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan