Wp(C)/1158/2019 Of Kallamkunnu Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/1158/2019 Of Kallamkunnu Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/1158/2019 Of Kallamkunnu Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 25TH POUSHA, 1940WP(C).No.1158 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
KALLAMKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDNO.R.314, KALLAMKUNNU, P.O NADAVARAMBA, THRISSUR-680 661, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI.GANESH C.K
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(2), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR- PIN 680 001.SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR- PIN 680 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),PIN-680 001.PIN-680 001.
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.THUSHARA JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appealbefore the second respondent. The petitioner alsofiled Ext.P3 stay application.
In view of the above, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to dispose ofExt.P3 stay application within a period of twomonths. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuantto the impugned order in the appeal shall be keptin abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
ln
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
//TRUE COPY//
ln
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.