Wp(C)/11637/2020 Of Space Centre Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (1)
High Court
15 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11637/2020 Of Space Centre Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (1)
Date of order
15 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/11637/2020 Of Space Centre Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (1), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.11637 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER/S:
SPACE CENTRE EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, VSSC ISRO POST,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695022.
BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 (1)WARD-2(1),OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695003.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOM TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
3THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK(FORMERLY KNOWN AS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK)THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT OFFICE, EAST FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER-IN-CHARGE.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 15th day of June 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
Jm/
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2017-2018 DATED 17.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 17.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 31.12.2019,ALONG WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT,AGAINST EXTP1 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT.P3 APPEAL DATED 05.02.2020.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2019 IN W.A.NO.1639 OF 2019.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.02.2020 IN WP(C)NO.4433 OF 2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.