Wp(C)/11650/2012 Of Smt.santhadharan v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2012/1ST JYAISHTA 1934 WP(C).No. 11650 of 2012 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : --------------------- SMT.SANTHADHARAN, AGED 67 YEARS,W/O.LATE R.VIDYADHARAN, 'VIDHYA',CHAYAKUDI LANE,PETTAH, PALLIMUKKU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SMT.NISHA JOHN SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR RESPONDENT(S) : ------------------------ 1. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III,KERA BHAVAN, SRV HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI - 682 011.KERA BHAVAN, SRV HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI - 682 011. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR,INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH,IST FLOOR (BLOCK C-I & C II), KENDRIYA BHAVAN,OPP.CSEZ, KAKKANAD, COCHIN - 695 014.INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH,IST FLOOR (BLOCK C-I & C II), KENDRIYA BHAVAN,OPP.CSEZ, KAKKANAD, COCHIN - 695 014. 4. THE MANAGER,STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, PETTAH BRANCH,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, PETTAH BRANCH,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014. 5. THE SECRETARY,CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NORTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI - 110 001.CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NORTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI - 110 001. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXBY SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBTBY SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:22-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMV WP(C).No. 11650 of 2012 (E) APPENDIX P.A.TO JUDGE AMV P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 11650 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22[nd] day of May, 2012 JUDGMENT The challenge against Ext.P1 assessment order passed bythe first respondent before the first appellate authority, did notturn fruitful, as evident from Ext.P2 order passed by the secondrespondent. Met with the situation, petitioner preferred furtherappeal before the third respondent as borne by Ext.P3 along withExt.P4 petition for stay, which are stated as pendingconsideration. Grievance is in respect of the coercive proceedingspursued in the meanwhile, which is sought to be intercepted inthis writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for thedepartment as well. 3. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposedof, directing the third respondent to consider and passappropriate orders on Ext.P4 I.A. for stay, in accordance withlaw, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'six weeks' W.P.C. No.11650 of 2012 from the date of receipt of a copy the judgment. The 'status quo', as on date, shall be maintained till suchtime. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent forfurther steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Kp/-