Wp(C)/11858/2022 Of Mohanan Mundakkal Simy v. Additional/ Joint/ Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11858/2022 Of Mohanan Mundakkal Simy v. Additional/ Joint/ Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/11858/2022 Of Mohanan Mundakkal Simy v. Additional/ Joint/ Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax /Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH FRIDAY, THE 22 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11858 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
MOHANAN MUNDAKKAL SIMY, AGED 42 YEARS KARANAYIL HOUSE, ETTUMANA, KARUVANNUR, THRISSUR-680 711.
BY ADVS. ANIL D. NAIR (SR.) TELMA RAJU; ARAVIND SREEKUMAR EDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
ADDITIONAL/ JOINT/ DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX /INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001.
BY ADVS. P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.) JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The present writ petition has been filed impugning Exts. P5 and P6, the assessment order and computation sheet respectively.
2. Sri Anil D Nair, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Adv Adityan Unnikrishnan, submits that in view of the
statement filed by the respondent, the petitioner would like to withdraw this writ petition and file the statutory appeal before
the Appellate Authority within a period of fifteen days from today.
3. Considering the said submission, the present writ petition is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to file the
appeal against the impugned assessment order in Ext.P5 within a period of fifteen days and if the appeal is filed within a period of fifteen days the same shall be considered on merits
W.P.(C) No.11858/2022
-3-
without entering into the question of limitation. The petitioner may also file the stay petition along with the appeal, which shall be considered expeditiously. For a period of one month, no coercive measure to be taken against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned assessment order.
Sd/-
DINESH KUMAR SINGHJUDGE
jjj
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11858/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 04.03.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 09.03.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTO OF THE ENVELOP BY WHICH EXHIBITS P1 AND P2 WERE RECEIVED EXHIBITS P1 AND P2 WERE RECEIVED
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE TRACKING RECORD OF EXHIBIT P3 AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEBSITE OF INDIA POST AS OBTAINED FROM THE WEBSITE OF INDIA POST
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 13.3.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT 13.3.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPUTATION SHEET IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ASSESSMENT ORDER
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES
Annexure A True copy of the history notings in this case is placed as proof proof
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.