Wp(C)/11957/2021 Of The District Lottery Officer v. Income Tax Officer(Tds)
High Court
08 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/11957/2021 Of The District Lottery Officer v. Income Tax Officer(Tds)
Date of order
08 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/11957/2021 Of The District Lottery Officer v. Income Tax Officer(Tds), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 8 DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 18TH JYAISHTA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 11957 OF 2021
PETITIONER :
THE DISTRICT LOTTERY OFFICER,
C BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, CIVIL STATION (P.O), KOZHIKODE - 673 020
BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS :
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,(TDS)IIIRD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673 001
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE - 673 001
BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 08.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P4 order imposing a penalty, an
appeal has been preferred before the respondent, as evidencedby Ext.P5. During the pendency of Ext.P5, a petition for stay hasbeen filed as Ext.P7. Petitioner apprehends that proceedings forrecovery of the amounts demanded under Ext.P4 may be initiatedagainst it, which will, according to the Petitioner be disastrous.
2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader aswell as the learned Standing Counsel for the department.
3. Having considered the circumstances arising in the
case, I am of the view that this writ petition itself can be disposedof by directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider and passappropriate orders on Ext.P7 petition for stay in a time boundmanner.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent
to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 petition forstay, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. Till the said petition is disposed of as
directed above, all proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 and Ext.P6 for
recovery of the amount demanded, shall be kept in abeyance.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
RKM
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
P1 : COPY OF THE LETTER NO.ITO(TDS)/CLT/CHND00034G/194B/ 2017-18
P2 : COPY OF THE REPLY TO EXHIBIT P1 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
P3 : COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.TDS/CLT/LOTTERY/194B/2018-
19.
P4 : COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TDS/CLT/DLO-CLT/201(1)&(IA)/FY 2015-16/2018-1916/2018-19
P5 : COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2015-2016.RESPONDENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2015-2016.
P6 : COPY OF LETTER RECEIVED ON 04.03.2021 FROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKODE DIRECTING TO PAY DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.DEPARTMENT, TDS RANGE, KOZHIKODE DIRECTING TO PAY DISPUTED AMOUNT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.
P7 : COPY OF THE STAY PETITION ALONG WITH A COVERING LETTER.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.