Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/12022/2007 Of Karuna Trust Rep. By...

Wp(C)/12022/2007 Of Karuna Trust Rep. By It's President v. Agriculture Income Tax & Sales Tax Offic

High Court 11 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12022/2007 Of Karuna Trust Rep. By It's President v. Agriculture Income Tax & Sales Tax Offic
Date of order
11 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12022/2007 Of Karuna Trust Rep. By It's President v. Agriculture Income Tax & Sales Tax Offic, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2007 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 12022 of 2007(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- KARUNA TRUST REP. BY IT'S PRESIDENT, KARUNANKARAN. BY ADV. SRI.C.J.XAVIER SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. AGRICULTURE INCOME TAX & SALES TAX OFFICER,ALLEPPEY. 2. THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDITIONAL BENCH,KOTTAYAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR AMBALAPUZHA, TALUK,ALLEPPEY. BY GOVERNMENT PELADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.12022 of 2007-F --------------------------------- Dated this the 11[th] day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court, praying inter alia, for adirection to the second respondent to pass final orders on Ext.P7. Now,when the writ petition was taken up for hearing today, it is submitted by thelearned counsel for the petitioner that the appeal has already been dismissedfor default on 2-1-2007 and the copy of the order has been received by thepetitioner. If that be so, the petitioner may work out its remedy against it.Further recovery pursuant to Ext.P4 assessment order will be kept inabeyance for a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the above-saidappeal judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. MS K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan