Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/12119/2005 Of M/S.e.j. Peter & Son...

Wp(C)/12119/2005 Of M/S.e.j. Peter & Sons v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 21 Nov 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

21 Nov 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12119/2005 Of M/S.e.j. Peter & Sons v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as notpressed. ln Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE /True copy/ P.A. to judge

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/30TH KARTHIKA 1934 WP(C).No. 12119 of 2005 (P) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- M/S. E.J.PETER & SONS, ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, EDASSERRY LISSIE HOSPITAL ROAD, COCHIN-682 018 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR.E.J.PETER. BY ADVS.SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN SMT.K.B.SUBHAGAMANI RESPONDENT(S):-------------- THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R. BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) R1 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR IT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ds ANTONY DOMINIC,J -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.12119 of 2005 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 21[st] day of November, 2012 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thematter is not pressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as notpressed. ln Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE /True copy/ P.A. to judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.