Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/12299/2019 Of Mary Matha Education...

Wp(C)/12299/2019 Of Mary Matha Education Society v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)

High Court 12 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12299/2019 Of Mary Matha Education Society v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
Date of order
12 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12299/2019 Of Mary Matha Education Society v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Keeping the above in view, thewrit petition is disposed of by this order: (a)The first respondent considers and disposes of Ext.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 12299 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: MARY MATHA EDUCATION SOCIETY, 11, C/O. CHERUPUSHPA NIVAS CONVENT, UMAYANALLOOR, KOLLAM 691589, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SR. SANTHI ANTONY VATTAPARAMBIL BY ADV. SMT.K.LATHA OTHER PRESENT: SC,CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 12299/2019 J U D G M E N T Heard Smt. Latha K, the petitioner's counsel and SriChristopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel. 2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the firstrespondent is not considering Ext.P2 rectification application. Withthe assistance of the learned counsel appearing for the parties thecontents in Ext.P2 are perused. This Court is of the view that thefirst respondent considers and disposes of the rectificationapplication (Ext.P2) expeditiously so that the petitioner, if it isaggrieved by the final outcome of the order, can work out theremedies in accordance with law. Keeping the above in view, thewrit petition is disposed of by this order: (a)The first respondent considers and disposes of Ext. P2rectification application as expeditiously as possible,preferably within ten weeks from today.rectification application as expeditiously as possible,preferably within ten weeks from today. (b)The petitioner is given liberty to re-submit theapplication along with a copy of this judgment for timelydecision by the respondent.application along with a copy of this judgment for timelydecision by the respondent. W.P.(C) No. 12299/2019 W.P.(C) No. 12299/2019 -4- EXHIBIT P7THE TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO.28121811081633 DATED 28.12.2018 OF E-PROCEEDINGS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan