Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/12387/2018 Of M/S Ananthapuram Ser...

Wp(C)/12387/2018 Of M/S Ananthapuram Service Co-Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 11 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12387/2018 Of M/S Ananthapuram Service Co-Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
11 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12387/2018 Of M/S Ananthapuram Service Co-Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1940 WP(C).No. 12387 of 2018 PETITIONER(S) M/S ANANTHAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REGISTERED AS A PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, AND HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT NO.28/80, ANANTHAPURAM TOWERS, KAITHAMUKKU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL SMT.RAAGA R.RAMALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), INCOME TAX BUILDINGS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003. 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), INCOME TAX BUILDINGS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003. R BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 20.12.2017.EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S. 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 TO THE PETITIONER DATED 27.03.2017.EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S. 143(3) R/W S.147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 20.12.2017.EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P-3 ORDER DATED 17.01.2018.EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH A LETTER TO PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX REQUESTING HIM FOR AN OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING DATED 18.01.2018.EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFIED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING NO.1914 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES DATED 29.02.2016.EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO.AAEAA4313K/W-2(1)/TVM/2017-18 DATED (ERRONEOUSLY AS) 09.02.2017.EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY DTD 10.4.2018 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ VPS PS TO JUDGE P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos. 12387 of 2018--------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11[th] day of April, 2018 JUDGMENT Petitioner was an assessee under the Income Tax Act(the Act) on the rolls of the second respondent. Aggrieved byExt.P3 assessment order, the petitioner preferred Ext.P4 appealbefore the first respondent. Ext.P5 is the application for staypreferred by the petitioner in Ext.P4 appeal. The grievance ofthe petitioner in the writ petition concerns the delay on the partof the first respondent in passing orders on Ext.P5 application forstay. It is alleged by the petitioner in the writ petition thatproceedings have already been initiated for realisation of theamounts covered by Ext.P3 order. The petitioner, therefore,seeks appropriate directions in this regard, in this writ petition. WPC 12387/18 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner asalso the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the WPC 12387/18 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner asalso the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitiondirecting the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P5application for stay, within two months from the date of receiptof a copy of this judgment. Ordered accordingly. Needless to saythat until orders are passed on Ext.P5 application for stay, furtherproceedings for realisation of the amount covered by Ext.P3assessment order shall be deferred. Sd/- vps 12/4 P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE /True Copy/PS to Judge The expression “Ext.P5” occurring in the 4[th] and 7[th]lines of paragraph 1 and 3[rd] and 6[th] lines of the operativeportion of the judgment dated 11/04/2018 in W.P.(C)No.12387/2018 is suo motu corrected as “Ext.P8” as perorder dated 11/04/2018 in W.P.(C) No.12387/2018. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan