Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/12481/2015 Of Kuruvambalam Service...

Wp(C)/12481/2015 Of Kuruvambalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Apr 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12481/2015 Of Kuruvambalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12481/2015 Of Kuruvambalam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/20TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12481 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- THE KURUVAMBALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,F 1638, CHEMMALASSERY P.O., MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE 673 001. 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD (4) TIRUR 676 101. R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.12481/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 7.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2NDRESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 30.4.2015 FILED BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 30.4.2015 FILED BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S TO JUDGE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.12481 OF 2015 (I)----------------------------------- Dated this the 10[th] day of April, 2015 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, thepetitioner had preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition beforethe 1[st] respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that, even prior toconsidering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by therespondents for recovery of the amounts confirmed against thepetitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand also the learned Government Pleader appearing for therespondents. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the caseas also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writpetition with the following directions: 1. The 1[st] respondent shall consider and pass orders onExt.P3 stay petition within a period of two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, prp after hearing the petitioner. 2.Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmedagainst petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment ordershall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the1[st] respondent as directed above and communicated tothe petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan