Wp(C)/12726/2018 Of M/S.ananthapuram Co Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
11 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12726/2018 Of M/S.ananthapuram Co Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
11 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/12726/2018 Of M/S.ananthapuram Co Operative Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1940
WP(C).No. 12726 of 2018
PETITIONER(S)
M/S.ANANTHAPURAM CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REGISTERED AS A PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, AND HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT NO. 28/80,ANANTHAPURAM TOWERS, KAITHAMUKKU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 024 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL
SMT.RAAGA R.RAMALAKSHMI
RESPONDENT(S)
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), INCOME TAX BUILDINGS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER., WARD-2(1), INCOME TAX BUILDINGS,
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 20-12-2017EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S. 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 TO THE PETITIONER DATED 27/03/2017.EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S. 143(3) R/W O S 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 20/12/2017.EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P-3 ORDER DATED 17/01/2018EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH A LETTER TO PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX REQUESTING HIM FOR AN OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING DATED 18/01/2018EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFIED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING NO. 1914 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES DATED 29/02/2016.EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO.AAEAA4313K/W-2(1)/TVM/2017-18 DATED (ERRONEOUSLY AS) 09-02-2017.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
VPS PS TO JUDGE
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
---------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) Nos. 12726 of 2018---------------------------------------------
Dated this the 11[th] day of April, 2018
JUDGMENT
Petitioner was an assessee under the Income Tax Act(the Act) on the rolls of the second respondent. Aggrieved byExt.P3 assessment order, the petitioner preferred Ext.P4 appealbefore the first respondent. Ext.P5 is the application for staypreferred by the petitioner in Ext.P4 appeal. The grievance ofthe petitioner in the writ petition concerns the delay on the partof the first respondent in passing orders on Ext.P5 application forstay. It is alleged by the petitioner in the writ petition thatproceedings have already been initiated for realisation of theamounts covered by Ext.P3 order. The petitioner, therefore,seeks appropriate directions in this regard, in this writ petition.
WPC 12726/18
-:2:-
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner asalso the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
WPC 12726/18
-:2:-
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner asalso the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitiondirecting the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P5application for stay, within two months from the date of receiptof a copy of this judgment. Ordered accordingly. Needless to saythat until orders are passed on Ext.P5 application for stay, furtherproceedings for realisation of the amount covered by Ext.P3assessment order shall be deferred.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
vps 12/4
/True Copy/PS to Judge
The expression “Ext.P5” occurring in the 4[th] and 7[th]lines of paragraph 1 and 3[rd] and 6[th] lines of the operativeportion of the judgment dated 11/04/2018 in W.P(C)No.12726/2018 is suo motu corrected as “Ext.P8” as perorder dated 11/04/2018 in W.P(C) No.12726/2018.
Sd/-Registrar (Judicial)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.