Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/12787/2020 Of Prahallad Prusty v....

Wp(C)/12787/2020 Of Prahallad Prusty v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 11 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

11 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/12787/2020 Of Prahallad Prusty v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 02. M. Panda IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) No.12787 of 2020 …. Prahallad Prusty …. Petitioner Mr. B. Panda, Advocate -versus- …. The Income Tax Officer, Kendrapara Opposite Parties and another Mr. Radheshyam Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel for IT Deptt. CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA ORDER 11.02.2022 1. The Petitioner’s stay application and appeal, if not already disposed of by the CIT (A), will be disposed of within a period of three months from today and in any event, not later than 18[th] May, 2022. A copy of this order be sent to the CIT (A) concerned forthwith for compliance. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (A. K. Mohapatra) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.