Wp(C)/12832/2017 Of M/S. Hillwood Furniture v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/12832/2017 Of M/S. Hillwood Furniture v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/12832/2017 Of M/S. Hillwood Furniture v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/21ST CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
M/S. HILLWOOD FURNITURE PVT.LTD:
NH 17: CHUNDAM:FEROKE:CALICUT:BY V.SHERIFF:MANAGING DIRECTOR
BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH
SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SKG
WP(C).No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------
P1PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2009.10
P2PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2010.11
P3PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2011.12
P4PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2012.13
P5PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2013.14
P6PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2014.15
P7PHOTOCOPY OF COMMON ORDER IN APPEALS AGAINST EXTS.P1 TO P6 ORDERSORDERS
P8PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P1 BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
P9PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P2 BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
P10RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P3 BEFORE SECOND
P11PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P4 BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
P12PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P5 BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
P13PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P6 BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
P14PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P8 APPEAL
P15PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P9 APPEAL
P16PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P10 APPEAL
P17PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P11 APPEAL
SKG
P18PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P12 APPEAL
P19PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P13 APPEAL
P20PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2009.10ORDER FOR 2009.10
P21PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2010.11ORDER FOR 2010.11
P22PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2011.12ORDER FOR 2011.12
P23PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2012.13ORDER FOR 2012.13
P24PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2013.14ORDER FOR 2013.14
P25PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE ORDER FOR 2014.15ORDER FOR 2014.15
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
------------------------------------------Dated: 11[th] April, 2017Dated: 11[th] April, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner preferred Exts.P8 to P13 appealsand Exts.P14 to P19 stay petitions under the IncomeTax Act, 1961 ('I.T Act' for short) against Exts.P1 to P6assessment orders and the first appellate order beforethe 2[nd] respondent. The grievance of the petitioner isthat even before the stay petitions have beenconsidered by the 2[nd]respondent, the recoveryproceedings have been initiated under the KeralaRevenue Recovery Act, 1968.
2. In the above circumstance, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and passorders on Exts.P14 to P19 stay petitions, within a periodof two months from the date of receipt of the certified
-2-
copy of this judgment and coercive proceedings shallstand stayed until such orders are passed, which order
shall determine the further steps thereafter.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 11/4/17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.