Wp(C)/13190/2020 Of Hotal Souparnika v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/13190/2020 Of Hotal Souparnika v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/13190/2020 Of Hotal Souparnika v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2020 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1942WP(C).No.13190 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER/S:
HOTAL SOUPARNIKANO.XXVIII/C/0374/71 PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KILIKOLLOOR, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, DEEPU CHACKO.
BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 5, KOLLAM-691 004.WARD 5, KOLLAM-691 004.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
3THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICERAAYKAR BHAWAN, IST FLOOR, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
O/O THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
4THE BRANCH MANAGERSTATE BANK OF INDIA, KADAPAPAKADA BRANCH, KADAPPAKADA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM-691 008.
5THE BRANCH MANAGER
THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD., KOLLAM BRANCH, PONNAMMA CHAMBERS II, HOSPITAL ROAD, KOLLAM, 691 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 2nd day of July 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction tothe appellate authority to dispose of the Exts.P4 and P5 appealsand Exts.P8 and P9 interim application preferred against theExts.P1 and P2 assessment orders issued by the first respondent.
2.Though this Court ought not to have interfered, but inthe interest of justice, without expressing any opinion, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondentto take a decision on Ext.P8 and P9 application for stay filedalong with Exts.P4 and P5 appeals in accordance with law, afteraffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.
nak
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.12.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.12.2018
FOR THE YEAR 2015-16.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF SEIZED RECORDS DATED 25.3.2015.DATED 25.3.2015.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P1 ORDER DATED 28.1.2019.EXT.P1 ORDER DATED 28.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P2 ORDER DATED 28.1.2019.EXT.P2 ORDER DATED 28.1.2019.
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-
20/1026492866(1)/251 DATED 12.3.2020.
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1026493879(1)/250 DATED 12.3.2020.NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1026493879(1)/250 DATED 12.3.2020.
EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED FORTHE YEAR 2014-15 IS DATED 19.6.2020.THE YEAR 2014-15 IS DATED 19.6.2020.
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED FORTHE YEAR 2015-16 IS DATED 19.6.2020.THE YEAR 2015-16 IS DATED 19.6.2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.