Wp(C)/13259/2017 Of M/S. Karakulam Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/13259/2017 Of M/S. Karakulam Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/13259/2017 Of M/S. Karakulam Service Co-Operative Bank v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/21ST CHAITHRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 13259 of 2017 (F)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
M/S. KARAKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.KP-1/382, KARAKULAM PONEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 564REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT. SREELATHA S.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(3)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)2ND FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVANKOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003
R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT R BY SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 13259 of 2017 (F)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
P1COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION NO.E 17/2013 DATED14.2.2013 GRANTED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), NEDUMANGAD,UNDER THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT
P2COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.12.16 ALONG WITHCOMPUTATION OF INCOME AND DEMAND NOTICE PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
P3COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDEMEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 17.1.2017
P4COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 7.4.2017 PRAYING FOR STAY OFRECOVERY OF THE DEMAND PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE APPEAL.
P5COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28.3.2017 ISSUED BY THE FIRSTRESPONDENT U/S 221(1) OF THE ACT.
P6COPY OF THE PETITION U/S 220(6)DATED 3.4.2017 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE the 1ST RESPONDENT
P7COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.2.2016 IN ITA NO.156/2014 PASSEDBY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
W.P.(C)No.13259 of 2017 - F
========================
Dated this the 11[th] day of April, 2017
JUDGMENT
Ext.P2 is the assessment order passed against the
petitioner. Against which, petitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal, whichis accompanied by Ext.P4 stay petition before the 2[nd]respondent. Appeal and stay petition are pending before the2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile, coercive proceedings havebeen initiated. It is in this context, the writ petition has beenfiled.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the
appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shall dispose ofExt.P4 stay application, within a period of two months fromtoday and the coercive proceedings be stayed until such
W.P.(C)No.13259/2017
orders are passed, which order shall determine the matterthereafter.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
SB/11/04/2017
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
// true copy //
P.A to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.