Wp(C)/13473/2022 Of A.s.shajahan v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Jan 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/13473/2022 Of A.s.shajahan v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/13473/2022 Of A.s.shajahan v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the fact that there appears to beviolation of principle of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided with fresh link and password etc, formaking submissions online before passing the impugnedorder on Ext.P9 dated 25.03.2022, the present writpetition is allowed and the impugned o...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGHFRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 22ND POUSHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 13473 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
A.S.SHAJAHAN,AGED 58 YEARS32/3071F, FABA AGENCIES, NH BYE PASS, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM-682 019.BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC No.13473 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12[th] day of January, 2024
The present writ petition has been filed impugningExt.P9 order dated 25.03.2022 passed under Section270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 whereby penalty underSection 271A of the Income Tax Act has been leviedamounting to Rs.83,44,607/-. It is being 2% ofRs.41,72,30,364/- in respect of the assessment year 2016-17.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthe petitioner was issued notice of hearing on 16.03.2022in Ext.P7 providing the link for making submissionsonline on 17.03.2022. On receipt of the said notice, thepetitioner requested for an adjournment vide email dated17.03.2022 itself. The said request for adjournment wasmade on the ground that the authorized representative ofthe petitioner had to attend the ritual of his father’sdeath anniversary on 17.03.2022 and therefore, it wasnot possible for him to attend the hearing on 17.03.2022.The request was received and the status on the portal
WPC No.13473 of 2022
would suggest that the request was opened. Learnedcounsel for the petitioner submits that no fresh link wasprovided for hearing and the impugned order came to bepassed exparte.
3.Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Senior
Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department is notin a position to suggest that fresh notice of hearing wasissued to the petitioner or fresh link was provided forjoining online for making submissions in respect of thepenalty proceedings which got finalised on 25.03.2022.
Considering the fact that there appears to beviolation of principle of natural justice as the petitioner
was not provided with fresh link and password etc, formaking submissions online before passing the impugnedorder on Ext.P9 dated 25.03.2022, the present writpetition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.The matter is remitted back to the respondent withdirection to provide fresh link to the petitioner formaking online submissions in respect of the penaltyproceedings. If the petitioner fails to join and make
WPC No.13473 of 2022
4
submissions after he is provided with the fresh link andpassword no further opportunity shall be granted. Letthis order be communicated to the respondent as arequest of learned Standing Counsel for compliance.
Sd/-
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
JUDGE
AP
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13473/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
Exhibit P2Exhibit P3
Exhibit P4
Exhibit P5
Exhibit P6
Exhibit P7Exhibit P8
Exhibit P9
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.03.2019.
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.01.2020.
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.02.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 27.08.2021.
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 03.09.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
TRUE COPY OF THE PROOF OF HAVING ELECTRONICALLY FILED THE REPLY.
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.03.2022.
TRUE COPY OF THE ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION FILED ALONG WITH EMAIL CONFIRMATION DATED 17.03.2022.
TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 25.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.