Wp(C)/13825/2022 Of Smt. Pooja Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/13825/2022 Of Smt. Pooja Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/13825/2022 Of Smt. Pooja Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The above writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to take up and dispose of Ext.P3 stayapplication within a period of 2 months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
TUESDAY, THE 12 DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1944WP(C) NO. 13825 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
SMT.POOJA RAJ PILLAI, RAJAVALSAM, PANANGADU, P.O.PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA-689501
BY ADVS.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFFDIVYA RAVINDRANM.H.ASIF ALI
RESPONDENTS:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX1CENTER CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM-691 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III, 28/243, “POORNIMA”, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-682036
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 12.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.13825 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM,J
---------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.13825 of 2022
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of April, 2022
JUDGMENT
Petitioner herein is an assessee before the 1[st]
respondent. Ext.P1 is the assessment order along with thedemand notice for the assessment year 2016-2017. Thepetitioner has challenged the order of assessment evidencedby Ext.P1, as per Ext.P2 appeal filed along with Ext.P3 stayapplication. The grievance raised by the petitioner is thatExts.P2 & P3 are not being considered by the 1[st] respondentand the respondents are proceeding with coercive steps torecover the amount due as per Ext.P1 assessment order.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well asthe learned Government Pleader.
3. The above writ petition is disposed of with a direction
to the 2[nd] respondent to take up and dispose of Ext.P3 stayapplication within a period of 2 months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken as
WP(C) No.13825 of 2022 3
directed above, all coercive steps to recover any amountpursuant to Ext.P1 order of assessment, shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM,
JUDGE
pm
WP(C) No.13825 of 2022 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 16.3.2022 PASSEDBY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2016-17 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICEAND COMPUTATION OF INCOME
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 25.03.2022FOR AY-2016-17 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 5.4.2022 FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY-2016-17
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.