Wp(C)/13922/2009 Of N.rajeevan v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/13922/2009 Of N.rajeevan v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/13922/2009 Of N.rajeevan v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This writ petition is, hence, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/26TH SRAVANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 13922 of 2009 (I) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
1. N.RAJEEVAN, SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE,
CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, CHITTARAIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR. CHITTARAIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR.
2. P.V. SUGATHAN, BRANCH MANAGER, CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, MANANTHERI BRANCH, KANNUR. CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, MANANTHERI BRANCH, KANNUR.
3. K.P. BALAKRISHNAN (RETIRED SECRETARY),
PRASANTHI,AYYAPPANTHODU, MANGATTIDOM, KANNUR-670 643.
4. K.V. RAJEEV, INTERNAL AUDITOR, CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, CHITTARIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR. CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, CHITTARIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR.
5. C.MOHANDAS, ACCOUNTANT,
CHITTARIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
CHITTARIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN
SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-1. AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR-1.
2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED
BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.
3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT (C), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT (C), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. CHITTARIPARAMBU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CHITTARIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR. BANK, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CHITTARIPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERALSRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXSRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY K.T.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
P1TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ALONG WITH THE PROFORMA F.NO.ITO(TDS)/KNR/2008-09 DTD.6.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.(TDS)/KNR/2008-09 DTD.6.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2007-08ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2008-09ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
P4TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DTD.31.3.2009.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
* * * * * * * * * * * *
W.P.C.No.13922 of 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 17[th] day of August 2016
J U D G M E N T
This writ petition is filed by certain employees/retiredemployees of a Co-operative Bank challenging deduction underSection 80(c) of the Income Tax Act for remittance to contributoryProvident Fund under Section 61 of the Kerala Co-operativeSocieties Act.
2.It is submitted that similar writ petition was filed beforethis Court earlier, which came to be dismissed as per thejudgment dated 13/12/2014 in W.P.C.No.17231/2010. Whiledeciding the said case, the learned Single Judge observed that theemployees/retired employees have no locus standi to challengethe same.
3.In the light of the aforesaid finding of the learnedSingle Judge, I do not think that any interference is possible in thismatter.
This writ petition is, hence, dismissed.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.