Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/14094/2008 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v....

Wp(C)/14094/2008 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v. Asst.commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 06 May 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14094/2008 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v. Asst.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 May 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/14094/2008 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v. Asst.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: There upon, the petitioner shall be afforded W.P.(C).14094/2008 an opportunity, if so advised, to raise additional groundsbefore the Appellate Authority and he shall also be heardbefore the appeals are disposed of on such additionalgrounds.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2008 / 15TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 14094 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.P.ABDUL MAJEED, SONA, KOTTARAM ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAGHUNATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE1(1) CALICUT. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) CALICUT. BY SRI. GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J------------------- W.P.(C).14094/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 6[th] day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT Though several contentions have been raised in thiswrit petition, after hearing learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing onbehalf of Income Tax Department, I am satisfied that theonly direction which is warranted at this stage is one tothe Appellate Authority to defer the disposal of appealsagainst Exts.P1, P2 and P3, till the cross-examination ofthe witnesses, as proposed under Ext.P10, is completedand reasonable opportunity is afforded to the petitioner toraise additional grounds before the Appellate Authority, ifso advised and if so warranted. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directingthe second respondent to defer the disposal of appealsagainst Exts.P1 to P3 for a period of six weeks from today.In the meanwhile, cross-examination of the witnesses asproposed under Ext.P10, shall be necessarily completed by25.5.2008. There upon, the petitioner shall be afforded W.P.(C).14094/2008 an opportunity, if so advised, to raise additional groundsbefore the Appellate Authority and he shall also be heardbefore the appeals are disposed of on such additionalgrounds. V.GIRI,Judge mrcs
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan