Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/14228/2014 Of R.viswanathan v. The...

Wp(C)/14228/2014 Of R.viswanathan v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer

High Court 14 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14228/2014 Of R.viswanathan v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/14228/2014 Of R.viswanathan v. The Agricultural Income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2014/23RD ASHADHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 14228 of 2014 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- R.VISWANATHAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. CHOYI, PROPRIETOR, ROYAL STEEL INDUSTRIES, NAMBIKOLLY P.O., SULTHANBATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673 592. BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.SREEJITH SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------- 1. THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,VAT CIRCLE, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673 592. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),KOZHIKODE-673 001. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY),TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 101. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 14228 of 2014 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS : ----------------------- EXT. P1 : COPY OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT'S ASSESSMENT ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE DTD.11.6.2013 UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT.DTD.11.6.2013 UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT. EXT. P2 : COPY OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT'S PENALTY ORDER DTD.11.6.2013 AND ITS DEMAND NOTICE.DEMAND NOTICE. EXT. P3 : COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S APPEAL NO.864/2013 DTD.20.7.2013 AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 : COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S APPEAL NO.863/2013 DTD.20.7.2013 AGAINST EXT.P2 PENALTY ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.EXT.P2 PENALTY ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT. P5 : COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DTD.22.1.2014 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR REALIZING THE AMOUNTS COVERED BY EXTS.P1 AND P2.FOR REALIZING THE AMOUNTS COVERED BY EXTS.P1 AND P2. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------- NIL. /true copy/ rvs/ P.A.TO JUDGE K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P(C) No.14228 of 2014W.P(C) No.14228 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14[th] day of July, 2014 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached the AppellateTribunal with an appeal against the assessment order. Thepetitioner submits that in fact, the assessments werecompleted without verifying the books of accounts and thatthe petitioner was not granted a reasonable opportunity ofhearing. The petitioner having approached the appellateTribunal, cannot raise such contentions before this Courtunder Article 226. The petitioner would have to urge thesame before the appellate authority and if recovery isthreatened, the petitioner would have to move a stayapplication before the appellate authority. In such circumstance, the writ petition cannot beentertained, the same is closed leaving open the liberties ofthe petitioner. Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P. A to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan