Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/1432/2008 Of Bijoy K.mahanti v. A....

Wp(C)/1432/2008 Of Bijoy K.mahanti v. A.c.of Income Tax

High Court 12 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/1432/2008 Of Bijoy K.mahanti v. A.c.of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/1432/2008 Of Bijoy K.mahanti v. A.c.of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

18. 12.12.2018 bksjm . Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the assessment order dated 31.12.2007 under Annexure-1/A passed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cuttack. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal before the appellate authority, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner approaches the appellate authority by filing an appeal along with an application for condonation of delay within a period of four weeks from today, the appellate authority shall take into consideration all the contentions raised by the petitioner. While considering the prayer for condonation of delay, the Appellate Authority shall also take into consideration the period of pendency of this writ petition, i.e. from 29.01.2008 till today, for approaching the wrong forum under bona fide mistake. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. The original documents filed by the petitioner may be returned after substituting attested photo copies thereof. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ……..………………… K.S. JHAVERI (CHIEF JUSTICE) ……..…………………… K.R. MOHAPATRA (JUDGE)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan