Wp(C)/14494/2022 Of Kerala Karshaka Sahakarana Federation Limited v. Additional/ Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14494/2022 Of Kerala Karshaka Sahakarana Federation Limited v. Additional/ Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/14494/2022 Of Kerala Karshaka Sahakarana Federation Limited v. Additional/ Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.TUESDAY, THE 26 DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 6TH VAISAKHA, 1944WP(C) NO. 14494 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
KERALA KARSHAKA SAHAKARANA FEDERATION LIMITED,KERA TOWER, WATER WORKS COMPOUND, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.ASHOK R.
BY ADVS.
ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINCOME TAX
INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI - 110 001.CENTRE, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI - 110 001.NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 26.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2013-2014, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 1[st] respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2.A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehendcoercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition forstay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coerciveproceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25/03/2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.